Private Internet Access (PIA) is a VPN service founded in 2010 and based in the United States. Its clients are open-source and its no-logs policy has been tested in court — it has had no logs to hand over to legal requests. It is owned by Kape Technologies. We have run no hands-on tests, so we publish no speeds, prices or rating — facts only, as of 23 June 2026.
Privacy posture & court record
PIA's most distinctive verifiable signal is not an audit but a court record: in legal requests, PIA has had no user logs to produce, which is real-world evidence of its no-logs design rather than a marketing claim. Its clients are also open-source, so the code can be inspected directly.
A court record and open-source clients are different kinds of evidence from a named-firm assurance engagement, and arguably harder to manufacture. Weigh them alongside PIA's US jurisdiction (below) rather than in isolation, and check PIA's own transparency and policy pages for the current position.
Jurisdiction & ownership
PIA is based in the United States, a member of the 5 Eyes alliance and a jurisdiction some privacy users avoid on principle. The honest counterweight is the court-tested no-logs record: PIA's argument is that a US base matters less when there are no logs to compel. Weigh both — the jurisdiction concern and the evidence that there is nothing to hand over.
PIA is owned by Kape Technologies, the same group as ExpressVPN and CyberGhost. If concentration of VPN brands under one owner is part of your threat model, that shared ownership is a material fact, which we disclose plainly rather than leave on a corporate page.
What we have not tested
We publish no speed or streaming figures because we have not measured them. PIA is often noted for a very large server network and configurable clients, but specific counts and features should be confirmed on PIA's own site, since they change.
Pricing and the money-back window change frequently and are best read off PIA's own pages at purchase. We leave those fields blank rather than publish a stale number, and recommend trialling the service on your real workload first.
Pros & cons
Pros
- Open-source clients — inspectable code.
- No-logs policy tested in court: no logs to hand over in legal requests.
- Long-standing provider (founded 2010).
Cons
- Based in the United States (a 5 Eyes member) — weigh against the court-tested no-logs record.
- Owned by Kape Technologies (same group as ExpressVPN and CyberGhost) — disclosed for transparency.
- We have run no hands-on tests, so we publish no speeds or rating.
Frequently asked questions
Has PIA's no-logs policy been proven?
PIA's no-logs policy has been tested in court: in legal requests it has had no user logs to produce. That court record, alongside its open-source clients, is real-world evidence of the no-logs design rather than a marketing claim — though you should still weigh it against PIA's US jurisdiction.
Is it a problem that PIA is based in the US?
The United States is a member of the 5 Eyes alliance, which some privacy users avoid on principle. PIA's counter-argument is its court-tested no-logs record: there were no logs to compel. Whether that satisfies your threat model is a judgement call — weigh the jurisdiction concern against the evidence.
Who owns Private Internet Access?
PIA is owned by Kape Technologies, the same group as ExpressVPN and CyberGhost. If avoiding common ownership across VPN brands matters to you, that shared ownership is a relevant fact, which we disclose rather than leave on a corporate page.